Dear Spenser Poultney
Thank you for your
email. I have noted what you say and passed your email to your own MP, Dan
Norris.
Yours sincerely
Clare
Short
from the office of
the Rt Hon Clare
Short MP
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Tel: 020 7219
4264
Fax: 020 7219
2586
website:www.epolitix.com/EN/MPWebsites/Clare+Short
-----Original
Message-----
From: spenser@lcs-test.co.uk
[mailto:spenser@lcs-test.co.uk]
Sent: 10 March 2009 09:00
To: SHORT,
Clare
Subject: The Legal Services Act - The LCS/SRA
Dear Clare
Short
The Legal Services Act - The LCS/SRA
The Legal Services Act
- A Complete Waste of Time for the Public?
It is with great regret
that I write to inform you that Clementi, the Legal Services Act and all of the
hard work put in by our MP's may have been a complete waste of
time.
It appears that as long ago as 2005 a bright young Law Society
Executive, Ms. Aman Virk, developed an infallible method of navigating the
complex delta-streams of future probability. This startling new technique
has enabled the Law Society (and now the All-New "independent" Solicitors
Regulation Authority) to deal with solicitor misconduct up to three years BEFORE
it takes place. No more backlogs of complaints. No more fines from the
LSO. Just pure "regulation" as never before seen?
Please
consider the political ramifications should this technique spreads to other
areas. Criminals can now be convicted up to three years BEFORE they commit
their crime. Judges need only pass a one-day sentence; to start on the day
the offender is GOING to commit the crime. Since the offender is in prison
at the critical time, the crime ITSELF is abolished. A Crime-Free Britain
and massive savings to the taxpayer. I feel sure this "future gazing" will
end the Credit Crunch too, though it may spell an end to the National
Lottery. The consequences for ALL of us are quite
staggering.
There are perhaps two other possible
explanations.:-
1. The New SRA is indistinguishable from the old
OSS/CCS. They are LYING to protect mal-practicing solicitors they KNOW to
be guilty.
2. The New SRA is so STUPID that all sharp objects should be taken
away from them NOW.
Back in 2004 my MP, Dan Norris, helped me when I
was having trouble getting the (then OSS) to investigate a serious complaint
against a local law firm. He succeeded in getting the file transferred to
the Parliamentary Casework Team... who did exactly NOTHING - the same old
Willing Blindness that has dogged the Law Society for 30 years or more - they
laugh at mere MP's
In 2008 ANOTHER solicitor from the SAME law firm
signed a similar false declaration on a bill of costs. "A most serious
disciplinary offence" according to a prominent Law Lord - attempting to claim
£1000's the firm was NOT entitled to - tantamount to criminal fraud. On
23rd October 2008 the Association of Law Costs Draughtsmen (ALCD) fined its
Member £5,000 with £500 costs for HIS part in the SAME misconduct. Under
Law Society Rules it is the SOLICITOR not Costs Draughtsman that is
responsible. We live in a Britain where the "monkey" gets fined and the
"organ grinder" (who stood to gain far more from this deception) gets off
Scott-free. Why? Because the so-called Solicitors Regulation
Authority claim that this misconduct (in 2008) was dealt with back in
2005. This has nothing to do with "Persistent Genes" - it is simply a
veritable "Crock".
Some of you will no doubt remember the address
by Dr. Vince Cable (just before the summer recess) where he told you that (in
2007) the CAB had 300,000 cases with a legal dimension referred to it, a quarter
of which involved the conduct of the solicitors involved. These are YOUR
Constituents - about 75,000 of them each year.
Please , PLEASE - if
these people approach YOU for help, do not ignore them. Please ALSO refer
them to www.lcs-test.co.uk - The Independent
Test of the so-called "regulators" in 2008/09. We have a survey, which is
open to anyone who has made an official complaint in the past 10 years. At
very least it is better they know the TRUTH so they can prepare for further
injustice. If you would like to receive a copy of our final Report at the
end of the year then please respond to this email.
Back in the 2004
Which? Report, one person described the Law Society as "a body that is 'drinking
at the same waterhole' as the legal hyenas it purports to be checking up
on." I suggest the very same is true of the LCS/SRA in 2009. Over 30
years, many Governments, many reforms and the SAME raw deal for everyone...
EXCEPT corrupt and incompetent solicitors. Why?
Spenser
Poultney (09/03/2009)
Will the OLSO Act THIS time, or will they
protect the SRA?
Check http://www.lcs-test.co.uk/HomeNav.htm
to find out. http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2008-07-22b.222.0
Spenser Poultney
Endersley
Welton
Road
Radstock
BA3 3UD
spenser@lcs-test.co.uk